Speak to a world-class expert now.
1-800-FOR-KKAI (1-800-367-5524)
info@kkai.com
PrimeTrack® Instant Conferencing
PrimeTrack® Project Management System (patent pending)
CENTER FOR RAPID RESPONSE ENGINEERING® SOLUTIONS
ENGINEERING AND SCIENTIFIC CONSULTING SERVICES
A case of technical issues between a manufacturer and an engineer-constructor
Lead Consultant
IMF is a Chemical Engineer, Process Engineer with world-class expertise in biotech, pharmaceutical, specialty chemicals, fats and oils, personal care products and food processing industries
Speak to this experienced, world-class expert now.
- Call (317) 536-7038
- E-mail imf@rapid-response-consulting.com
For additional or different expertise, browse other top-level expert resumes in Expert Testimony, Failure Analysis, Manufacturing Optimization, KKAI's Center for Rapid Response Engineering® Solutions and a host of other Engineering and Scientific Consulting services.
Learn how KKAI assembles expert teams of any size or skill set combination to meet our clients' needs on a rapid-response basis - no matter how complex the challenge.
Or, peruse our 400 case studies or 500 other expert resumes.
A case developed between a manufacturer of specialty chemicals and the engineering-construction contractor it had hired. The manufacturer had decided to build a facility to manufacture synthetic caffeine based on a process it had purchased and hired an engineer (subsequently the engineer-constructor) to design and build the facility. The manufacturer had not manufactured caffeine before nor had it ever undertaken a project of this size and scope. When the contract was signed to design the process and engineer the facility, the manufacturer’s CEO insisted on an unrealistic schedule: approximately six months. After much discussion the engineer said it would design, construct and start up the facility in a more realistic but ambitious schedule pending timely approval of documents.
In the later stages of the design-construction fast track project, the manufacturer stopped paying the monthly invoices and the engineer-constructor sued for its outstanding engineering fees of approximately 1.9 million dollars. It did not however stop the work. The manufacturer counter-sued for 37 million dollars stating that the schedule had not been met and that in some 100 instances the engineer-constructor had failed to design or build the facility correctly.
We were hired by the lawyer representing the engineer-constructor to review the claims of adequate design or construction. Other experts were hired to review schedule claims, cost claims and start up issues.
During the time we took on the case the plant was completed and started up and production was proceeding on a limited basis. China had started to manufacture synthetic caffeine and was bringing product into the country at a lower price.
We reviewed completely the process purchased by the manufacturer and piloted in his laboratory, the design and construction documents for the facility generated by the engineer-constructor including the Process Flow Diagrams (PFDs), The Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs), The Process Calculations, The Equipment Specifications, The Equipment Layout Drawings, The Piping Drawings, The Instrumentation and Controls Specifications, the correspondence between manufacturer and engineer-constructor and the Meeting Notes. In addition we reviewed completely the legal documents filed by each side, all the technical claims and the depositions given and taken by all parties concerned. We also reviewed applicable federal and local regulations for the production of this product.
We visited the facility and interviewed plant and operating personnel. After our investigation was complete we filed a complete report on all the technical claims. We were then deposed by the lawyer representing the manufacturer (one of the most sought after firms dealing with industrial claims). This lawyer was in addition a graduate chemical engineer and understood completely the information we had filed. At times during the deposition, this lawyer acknowledged the accuracy of my conclusions. However, I was strongly questioned on all points.
Within a month after my deposition, the case was settled out of court to the complete satisfaction of my clients and the case never went to trial.
Read other articles by this KKAI Associate:
Specialty Chemical Accident Investigation
Personal Care Products Production Efficiency
| Chemical Engineer, Process Engineer, biotech, pharmaceutical, specialty chemicals, fats and oils, personal care products and food processing industries | |
| Resume of USM | food science, sanitation, quality, expert consultant |
| Resume of HAH | packaging consultant, failure analysis, expert consultant |
| Resume of NLF | semiconductor, wafer fabricator, expert consultant |
| Resume of VQL | gmp compliance, fda, pharmaceutical expert consultant |
To search for specific expertise, enter your search query (type of
expertise you are seeking) in the box below, choose to search the entire
Rapid-Response site or just resumes and brochures, then click the search button.
Please note that the list of resumes available online is a select subset of our
vast database. If your search of our site does not reveal the expertise you are
seeking, please call us toll-free (in the U.S.) at 1-800-367-5524 or
contact us for more information and we will gladly assist you in
locating the specific expertise you require.
Have an urgent litigation support or engineering and scientific consulting need? Contact KKAI now for world-class, expert rapid response.
1-800-FOR-KKAI (1-800-367-5524)
info@kkai.com
BACK TO THE TOP OF THIS PAGE
Kevin Kennedy & Associates, Inc.
Rapid Response Engineering® Solutions
3905 Vincennes Road, Suite 320
Indianapolis, Indiana 46268
(317) 536-7000 voice
(317) 536-7220 fax